Orrick, Pillsbury call off big U.S. law firm merger

Mon Nov 25, 2013 5:03pm EST
 
Email This Article |
Share This Article
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
| Print This Article | Single Page
[-] Text [+]

By Casey Sullivan

NEW YORK (Reuters) - One of the biggest proposed U.S. law firm mergers of the year has been called off, the leaders of the two firms told Reuters Monday.

The potential merger between the California-based Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe and Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman in New York would have created one of the largest law firms in the country. It was first reported by Reuters on October 25.

Orrick Chairman Mitch Zuklie and Pillsbury Chairman James Rishwain said in a joint interview that a conflict of interest between clients in Orrick's public finance practice and Pillsbury's tax, environmental and real estate practices killed the merger.

"We are disappointed that we are not able to bring this over the goal line," said Zuklie.

The chairmen declined to identify specific clients, but Rishwain said Orrick represents government agencies that are sometimes on opposite sides of disputes with companies represented by Pillsbury.

According to Orrick's website, the firm has historically advised governments and underwriters on big publicly funded projects including the Golden Gate Bridge in San Francisco and Carnegie Hall in New York City.

Orrick's clients have also included Apple Inc (AAPL.O: Quote), Microsoft Corp (MSFT.O: Quote) and PG&E Corp (PCG.N: Quote), while Pillsbury has represented Chevron Corp (CVX.N: Quote), BNY Mellon BKBML.UL and Xerox (XRX.N: Quote), among others, according to sources with direct knowledge of the firms' clients.

Orrick, with about 1,000 lawyers, and Pillsbury, with more than 600 lawyers, were engaged in merger talks since July, the chairmen said. When Reuters reported the news in October, both sides expected a deal to come together within weeks, according to a source with knowledge of the discussions.   Continued...