Microsoft lawyer suggests non-U.S. data storage for overseas users: FT
SEATTLE (Reuters) - Microsoft Corp's head lawyer has suggested that overseas customers will be allowed to have their personal data stored in non-U.S. data centers, the Financial Times reported on Wednesday.
It would be the most radical move yet by a U.S. technology company to combat concerns that U.S. intelligence agencies routinely monitor foreigners.
A Microsoft spokesperson declined further comment on the remarks that Brad Smith, Microsoft's general counsel, made to the comments to the Financial Times, which published them on Wednesday.
"People should have the ability to know whether their data are being subjected to the laws and access of governments in some other country and should have the ability to make an informed choice of where their data resides," Smith told the FT.
He went on to say that customers could choose where to have their data stored in Microsoft's wide network of data centers, for example Europeans could specify a facility in Ireland.
The airing of the idea, which Smith did not back up with concrete plans, was the clearest sign so far that Microsoft is worried about the public backlash, especially overseas, to revelations by former National Security Agency (NSA) contractor Edward Snowden that the NSA claimed to directly tap into tech companies' servers to spy on foreign individuals.
Microsoft denies that, and has said that it only hands over customer data when properly requested by intelligence agencies, but an air of mistrust has remained, especially in Europe and China.
If Microsoft follows through on Smith's suggestion, it would mark a departure from U.S. technology companies' largely unified response to the NSA scandal, which has so far steered away from the idea of offering non-U.S. data storage for overseas users.
Microsoft, along with Apple Inc, Facebook Inc, Google Inc, Twitter Inc and others jointly called in December for reforms in the way governments use internet surveillance, lobbying for more transparency and a ban on bulk data collection. Continued...