KPMG refuses to approve BES accounts, warns of further loss
LISBON (Reuters) - Auditor KPMG has refused to approve bailed-out Banco Espirito Santo's first-half report and accounts, published on Monday, citing the bank's failure to provide adequate information on its financial position and also warned of possible further losses.
BES's consolidated report confirmed a loss of nearly 3.6 billion euros (4.73 billion US dollar), first revealed on July 30, largely due to its exposure to its founding Espirito Santo family's crumbling business empire.
The losses forced the Bank of Portugal to step in on Aug.3 with a 4.9 billion euro rescue plan for the country's biggest bank, using public funds.
Regulators also decided to put BES's healthy assets into a new entity, Novo Banco, while BES's exposures to the troubled Espirito Santo business empire as well as its Angolan subsidiary will move into a "bad bank."
KPMG, which had been hired to audit the results, said in a report published alongside BES's accounts that these did not provide any adjustments and additional information required as a result of the rescue. KPMG said this meant the BES report no longer provided adequate information on BES' financial position and operations.
"... it was not possible to obtain sufficient and appropriate proof to form a basis for the present report on half-year review," KPMG said.
The accounting firm said that "the classification, recoverability and realization of assets as well as repayment of its debts registered in the financial results as of June 30 is uncertain." KPMG also said the criteria of evaluation of BES assets transferred to Novo Banco were still not clear.
KPMG also said provisions set aside by BES to deal with Espirito Santo group's debt sold to its retail clients may not be enough as it risks having to make further contingencies, which so far have not been specified.
The accounting firm said that senior bonds with maturities going out as far as 2022 issued by BES worth 2.7 billion euros, already recognized in BES' liabilities, could incur unspecified further losses for BES if it were forced to buy them back. Continued...