JPMorgan defeats London Whale shareholder lawsuit in U.S.
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal appeals court said JPMorgan Chase & Co Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon and other bank officials need not face a shareholder lawsuit claiming they did a bad job investigating the 2012 "London Whale" trading scandal that caused $6.2 billion of losses.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday said the plaintiff Ernesto Espinoza did not show that JPMorgan's board was grossly negligent or engaged in bad faith in probing the losses and whether bank officials publicly downplayed them, and in deciding not to sue the people involved.
JPMorgan suffered losses in its chief investment office because of derivative bets by Bruno Iksil, known as the London Whale because of the size of his wagers.
Dimon received criticism soon after the scandal broke for calling media reports about the losses a "tempest in a teapot."
Writing for the New York-based appeals court, Chief Judge Robert Katzmann said JPMorgan conducted an "exhaustive" London Whale probe that led to many changes sought by Espinoza including pay cuts, clawbacks and improved controls.
Citing applicable Delaware law, Katzmann also called courts "ill-suited" to second-guess board decisions, and said New York-based JPMorgan was not required to explain to Espinoza point-by-point why it did not do more.
"Espinoza has not sufficiently rebutted the presumption that JPMorgan's board acted in good faith in responding to his demand letter," Katzmann wrote for a three-judge panel.
George Aguilar, a partner at Robbins Arroyo representing Espinoza, said: "We're naturally disappointed by the court's opinion, but respectful of its view." No decision has been made on whether to appeal. Continued...