New Jersey takes sports betting argument to full appeals court

Wed Feb 17, 2016 5:19pm EST
Email This Article |
Share This Article
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
| Print This Article | Single Page
[-] Text [+]

By Hilary Russ

PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - Federal appeals judges on Wednesday scrutinized New Jersey's 2014 law allowing sports betting, peppering lawyers during oral arguments with questions about the state's latest attempt to legalize the activity by partially repealing a prohibition against it.

"At some point a partial repeal is so specific that it is really authorizing," said Judge Kent Jordan, asking Theodore Olson, who represented New Jersey, to grapple with the issue.

New Jersey tried to allow sports wagering in 2014 by repealing a prohibition against it at casinos and racetracks. The National Collegiate Athletics Association and professional sports leagues sued the state.

They and the U.S. government argued that New Jersey's strategy is tantamount to authorizing the activity in particular locations.

The hearing in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia was before 12 judges who agreed to re-hear New Jersey's appeal after a three-judge panel previously sided with the sports leagues.

Just over two weeks ago, Americans placed an estimated $4.1 billion of illegal bets on the National Football League championship, Super Bowl 50, according to the American Gaming Association.

Congress banned legalized U.S. sports betting in 1992 in all but four states, particularly Nevada.

But with New Jersey's eroded casino industry and sluggish economy, the state first allowed sports betting in 2012 until it was stymied by the Third Circuit. It continues to try, fighting the legal battle while other states watch.   Continued...

A man counts out $100 bills as he makes a bet on Super Bowl XLVIII at the Las Vegas Hotel & Casino Superbook in Las Vegas, Nevada January 23, 2014.  REUTERS/Las Vegas Sun/Steve Marcus