UPDATE 1-Auto task force members say were not aware of GM's faulty ignition switch

Wed May 21, 2014 5:16pm EDT
Email This Article |
Share This Article
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
| Print This Article | Single Page
[-] Text [+]

(Recasts, adds Rattner comments in paragraphs 4-5, 10-11)

By Eric Beech

WASHINGTON May 21 (Reuters) - Two former members of the U.S. auto task force that helped restructure General Motors Co in 2009 during its bankruptcy said they were not aware at the time of the defective ignition switches linked to at least 13 deaths.

Harry Wilson, speaking at a conference in Washington, said the task force on which he served never met with lower level GM engineers, adding that the crisis brought on by the faulty switch showed the cultural problems at the largest U.S. automaker.

"We didn't know about anything like this," he said of the defective part. "It seems to have been basically stuck at the mid-level of the engineering department and not risen above that," Wilson said at an event hosted by the Brookings Institution.

Steven Rattner, who headed the task force, said his group would not have learned about the problem unless someone at GM had told them.

"We were not forensic accountants. We were not FBI investigators. We had about 40 days to do all this due diligence. We're not going to find something like that out unless people tell you," he said after the Brookings conference.

GM last week was fined a record $35 million by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for its delayed response on the faulty switch, which engineers first discovered in 2001. The company still faces probes by the U.S. Department of Justice, Congress, the Securities and Exchange Commission and several states about how it handled the issue. GM also expects to complete an internal probe within two weeks.

Wilson said the defective ignition switch and resulting recall of 2.6 million vehicles globally showed that decisions at the company were previously driven by the company's weak financial condition as well as various departments, such as legal and engineering, not communicating well with each other.   Continued...