Alberta Clipper expansions struggle in Keystone pipeline's shadow

Tue Apr 22, 2014 5:38pm EDT
Email This Article |
Share This Article
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
| Print This Article | Single Page
[-] Text [+]

By Timothy Gardner

WASHINGTON, April 22 (Reuters) - The spotlight on TransCanada Corp's Keystone XL pipeline has obscured another project that would send more Canadian oil sands petroleum to the United States, but this one too is struggling for traction.

Enbridge Inc hopes to expand its Clipper pipeline that currently sends up to 500,000 barrels of oil per day from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin, in order to further tap Western Canada's oil sands, the world's third-largest crude oil reserve, behind Venezuela and Saudi Arabia.

The first expansion would be 120,000 bpd, and the second would be 230,000 bpd. Both would increase the pipeline's capacity by adding horsepower to pumping stations. If completed, the full pipeline would rival TransCanada Corp's Keystone XL's planned capacity of more than 800,000 bpd.

Enbridge's Clipper expansions have largely escaped the attention of environmentalists focused on Keystone.

The company also hopes to avoid the application delays at the State Department that have stymied Keystone. But exactly when the expansions would get the green light is not known.

"As was the case with the Keystone XL, the State Department is under no set timeline for Clipper's environmental impact statement," a department official said on condition of anonymity about the status of the expansion applications.

The Obama administration's final decision on Keystone had been expected this summer after the State Department issued a final environmental assessment in January. The review concluded that the project would not add to emissions because the oil would find its way to market whether or not the pipeline is built.

But last week the State Department announced it would not make a decision on Keystone until the Supreme Court of Nebraska, a state the pipeline would cross, settles a dispute concerning the pipeline's route. That will likely push a final decision, already pending for more than five years, past the Nov. 4 midterm elections.   Continued...