U.S. judges weigh ex-mogul Conrad Black's appeal
By Andrew Stern
CHICAGO (Reuters) - U.S. judges reviewing former media mogul Conrad Black's conviction on Wednesday questioned whether jurors found him guilty of depriving shareholders of his "honest services" or of being a thief.
The distinction is crucial to Black's effort to have his 2007 guilty verdict on three fraud counts and obstruction of justice tossed out based on a Supreme Court ruling that limited the scope of the "honest services" law.
"How is this not theft? What is the theory?" asked Judge Richard Posner of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in a blistering question period during oral arguments.
The honest services law has been used by prosecutors in government and corporate fraud cases. But the high court declared it was overused and overbroad.
It sent Black's case back to lower courts to determine if instructions to the jury tainted the verdict.
Based on the possibility that he could face a lesser sentence, Black, 66, was released in July on $2 million bond from a Florida prison.
He had served two years of a 6-1/2-year sentence for swindling shareholders of newspaper holding company Hollinger International Inc. If some convictions are tossed, Black would be resentenced.
Legal experts said Posner's line of questioning may indicate he believes two of Black's three fraud convictions for paying himself for bogus non-compete agreements relied on the honest services law, while the third involving a smaller payment did not. Continued...