Rushdie, Amis targeted in critical maulings of 2012

Tue Jan 8, 2013 10:39am EST
Email This Article |
Share This Article
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
| Print This Article | Single Page
[-] Text [+]

By Mike Collett-White

LONDON (Reuters) - Their status as literary heavyweights could not save them from the savage sarcasm of the critics.

Novelists Martin Amis and Salman Rushdie and former poet laureate Andrew Motion were all up for critical mauling of the year in a shortlist published on Tuesday.

"Hatchet Job of the Year", run by British literary criticism website The Omnivore, was set up to celebrate serious book reviewing which organizers said was a dying art in the age of Amazon, blogs and Twitter.

Now in its second year, it is awarded to the "angriest, funniest, most trenchant book review" of the past 12 months, and this year's winner will be chosen from eight nominees.

Among those with the harshest verdicts over the last year were Ron Charles of the Washington Post for his review of Amis's "Lionel Asbo", and Zoe Heller for her critique of Rushdie's memoir "Joseph Anton" in the New York Review of Books.

"Critics' quills were noticeably sharper in 2012," said Anna Baddeley, The Omnivore editor. "But there is still a long way to go. Book reviews are, in the main, too fawning and dull."

While the reviews do not reflect overall reaction to the works in question, Charles said Lionel Asbo served up "blanched stereotypes on the silver platter of his (Amis's) prose as though it contained enough spice to entertain or even shock.

"Does any other truly great writer make us wonder whether his brilliant parts are worth the wearisome whole?" wrote Charles, the first U.S. critic to be included.   Continued...

Author Salman Rushdie gestures during an interview with Reuters in central London, September 28, 2012. REUTERS/Paul Hackett