Gay couples wed in Michigan want state to recognize marriages

Mon Apr 14, 2014 4:01pm EDT
 
Email This Article |
Share This Article
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
| Print This Article | Single Page
[-] Text [+]

By Kim Palmer

CLEVELAND (Reuters) - Ohio must recognize the marriages of same-sex couples wed legally outside the state, a federal judge ruled on Monday in the latest in a string of decisions supporting an expansion of gay rights.

U.S. District Judge Timothy Black in Cincinnati had said earlier in April he expected to enter a ruling striking down Ohio's ban on recognizing legal same-sex marriages as a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine has said he planned to appeal the decision once it was handed down.

Black had previously entered narrower orders that required Ohio, which bans same-sex marriage, to allow two gay men to be listed as "spouse" on the death certificates of husbands they married outside Ohio.

The ruling on Monday does not address the ban on same-sex couples marrying within Ohio adopted in 2004.

Black said the court record was "staggeringly devoid of any legitimate justification for the state's ongoing arbitrary discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation ..."

The case was brought by three female same-sex couples expecting children conceived by anonymous donors within months and a male couple with an Ohio-born adopted son who want their birth certificates to reflect both parents. All were married legally in other states.

"Ohio's marriage recognition ban embodies an unequivocal, purposeful, and explicitly discriminatory classification, singling out same-sex couples alone, for disrespect of their out-of-state marriages and denial of their fundamental liberties," Black wrote.   Continued...

 
Bernie Liang (L), and Ryan Hamachek, show their rings after getting married outside Seattle City Hall in Seattle, Washington December 9, 2012. REUTERS/Cliff Despeaux