WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The eight biggest U.S. banks will need to hold twice as much equity capital as required globally under a new rule launched by U.S. regulators on Tuesday, intended to protect taxpayers from any future costly bailouts.
The rule, launched by the country’s three main banking regulators, would impose a so-called leverage ratio, a hard cap on how much banks can borrow to fund their business, requiring them to hold equity capital equal to 6 percent of total assets.
The global capital accord known as Basel III, named after the Swiss city that is home to overseer Bank of International Settlements, sets a leverage ratio of 3 percent, which critics say is unambitious.
“A three percent minimum supplementary leverage ratio would not have appreciably mitigated the growth in leverage ... in the years preceding the recent crisis,” Martin Gruenberg, who heads the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, said at a public meeting on Tuesday.
The banks would have until January 2018 to meet the new requirements. FDIC staffers said it should not be difficult for the megabanks to hit the targets, but bank groups warned that the heightened levels could harm the economic recovery.
Banks balked last week when the Federal Reserve laid out plans for future rules that will further rein in Wall Street, including a capital surcharge for the biggest banks.
The eight banks subject to the new rules are JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N), Citigroup Inc (C.N), Bank of America Corp (BAC.N), Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N), Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS.N), Morgan Stanley (MS.N), Bank of New York Mellon Corp (BK.N) and State Street Corp (STT.N).
Some European countries have also started telling banks to hold more capital than the minimum levels. In Britain, regulators warned Barclays (BARC.L) they would not accept any plans to restrict lending after telling it to ramp up its leverage ratio to 3 percent, from 2.5 percent now.
And the Swiss National Bank has told Credit Suisse CSGN.VX and UBS UBSN.VX they must cut debt levels that still top international rivals. Both banks reported a leverage ratio of 3.8 percent at the end of the first quarter, below the 4.3 percent regulators want to see by 2019.
Forcing banks to draw more funding from equity capital and rely less on borrowed capital has been a pillar of regulators’ efforts to make the lenders sturdier after the devastating 2007-2009 financial crisis.
Under Basel III, which is being adopted across the world, banks must ramp up their capital buffers, but reform advocates and some U.S. politicians have pressured regulators to do more, saying the global rules can easily be gamed.
That is because Basel III allows banks to measure the risk in loans and exposure in other complex financial instruments by using their own mathematical models. A leverage ratio does not allow such risk weightings.
The U.S. plan was proposed simultaneously by the country’s three main banking regulators: the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and the Federal Reserve.
In the plan, the 6 percent ratio applies to the banking units insured by the FDIC.
The regulators also proposed a leverage ratio of 5 percent for holding companies that own the insured banks and also include far more risky investment banking activities.
Sheila Bair, a former head of the FDIC who now leads the think tank, Systemic Risk Council, applauded the move to tougher leverage constraints. But she said the weaker requirements for bank holding companies were disappointing.
“Weaker capital rules for securities and other nonbank affiliates were a source of system instability during the crisis,” Bair said in a statement. “We hope the regulators will strengthen and align bank holding company capital requirements with those applicable to banks before finalizing these rules.”
Almost all of the big banks are expected to meet the 5 percent ratio by the end of 2017, suggesting the rule won’t force banks to have to return to investors and engage in sudden share sales, an FDIC staffer said.
“Any shortfalls can easily be reached”, said bank analyst Gerard Cassidy of RBC Capital Markets.
Banks would have needed to raise $89 billion to meet the 6 percent ratio if the rule had been in place as of the third quarter of 2012, the FDIC said.
Banks can boost their leverage ratio by raising equity - for instance by retaining earnings - or reducing exposure to loans or other assets. Estimates for the ratios vary, depending on what analysts factor into the equation, making it difficult to determine how closely banks adhere to the targets.
Analysts, on average, estimate leverage ratios at 4.6 percent for Morgan Stanley; 5.1 percent for Citigroup; 5.3 percent for JPMorgan Chase; 5.7 percent for Goldman and Bank of America Corp; and 7.5 percent for Wells Fargo.
Tim Pawlenty, president of industry group Financial Services Roundtable, said the proposal could harm the larger economy and the competitiveness of U.S. banks.
“This new proposal, combined with existing capital and leverage requirements, will make it harder for banks to lend and keep the economic recovery going,” Pawlenty said.
The regulators will now collect comments from the industry, and then adopt the rule later, after possibly tweaking.
The OCC and the FDIC also adopted a final rule to introduce the Basel III capital accord, following a similar decision by the Fed last week.
Tom Hoenig, the FDIC’s second-in-command and an outspoken proponent of higher capital levels for banks, voted against the adoption of the Basel rules saying all banks were already in compliance with its current requirements.
“It does nothing in the interim to strengthen the balance sheets of U.S. banks,” he said at the meeting.
Two U.S. senators, Sherrod Brown, an Ohio Democrat, and David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, have proposed a 15 percent leverage ratio for the largest U.S. banks.
“This is a major step in the right direction of higher capital standards that so many, including Sherrod Brown and me, have been pushing for,” Vitter said in a statement.
Additional reporting by Lauren LaCapra and David Henry in New York; Editing by Karey Van Hall, Jeffrey Benkoe and Chris Reese