May 6, 2015 / 10:40 AM / in 3 years

StanChart sees UK bank tax rising again amid HQ review

LONDON (Reuters) - Standard Chartered STAN.L said it expected Britain to increase its bank levy again and the rising cost of the tax was a key issue in its assessment of whether to keep its headquarters in London or move to Asia.

A man walks past the head office of Standard Chartered bank in the City of London February 27, 2015. REUTERS/Eddie Keogh/Files

Standard Chartered Chairman John Peace told investors on Wednesday the Asia-focused bank had “no current plans to move” but was keeping its domicile under review. Rival HSBC HSBA.L is formally reviewing the best place for its HQ and will decide whether to move in the next few months.

“We are listening carefully to our shareholders on this issue ... in light of the latest increase in the bank levy, the likelihood of further increases and the impact on the group’s costs,” Peace said at the annual shareholder meeting.

Analysts said a move could make more sense for Standard Chartered than HSBC, but the bank had other operating problems that would be a higher priority for its new chief executive.

Former JPMorgan JPM.N investment bank boss Bill Winters is taking over as CEO from Peter Sands on June 10. Winters started working at the bank last week, and has been meeting shareholders and visiting operations.

Standard Chartered is trying to turn around its performance after a torrid two years and a purge of leadership. The bank is trying to cut costs and shrink its loan book to improve its profitability and deal with concerns about its capital.

The bank’s shares are up 13 percent since Winters was appointed in February. One shareholder at the meeting said Winters was “the bearer of hope” for the bank.

Former McKinsey consultant Sands told investors he was proud of his 13 years at the bank, including more than eight as CEO. “Along the way we’ve had many ups and downs, we’ve had great successes and made our share of mistakes,” he said.

Peace said the bank was taking action to revive its fortunes, but was “being careful not to take any knee-jerk actions which may damage the long term prospects.”

The bank also came under fire from environmental group Greenpeace for advising and funding a controversial Australian coal mining project, and was urged to end its relationship with any company involved in the Carmichael mine.

Peace said the bank was looking into the issue and would go no further until it was “satisfied with all the environmental aspects,” but refused to say if it was funding the project.

Editing by Elaine Hardcastle and Keith Weir

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below