BEIJING (Reuters) - China is set to unveil key legal reforms this week that will try to limit the influence local officials have on court cases, a move being closely watched by company executives who hope it will make the legal system more impartial.
The announcement is expected at the end of an Oct. 20-23 meeting of the ruling Communist Party elite, which has made the “rule of law” the theme of the gathering. The meeting, called a plenum, comes at a time when slowing economic growth in the world’s second-largest economy is raising the prospect of more commercial disputes.
The business community, in particular Chinese private firms and foreign investors, have long complained about the difficulty of getting a fair hearing in court because judges usually answer to local governments and party organs, which often have their own interests to protect.
Chinese media has recently carried reports on local companies suing each other when a dispute arises, with the parties lodging separate cases in courts in their home provinces, which then inevitably find for the home firm.
In April, Knowles Corp (KN.N), a New York-listed maker of advanced micro-acoustic products, said its lawyers had been blocked by a provincial court from attending a patent infringement case involving Chinese group GoerTek.
Ahead of the plenum, a meeting of the roughly 370-member Central Committee that usually takes place annually, state media has noted that the key goals are to temper the influence of local governments in courts and to make judges more professional and not tools of the party.
This would involve “reforming the judicial system to prevent local officials from interfering in court decisions”, a source with knowledge of the plenum agenda told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
However, while the party may be seeking to limit the influence of officials on courts, there is no suggestion China is about to set up an independent judiciary, and for sensitive cases, such as high-level corruption or for prominent dissidents, the party will remain firmly in charge.
While the legal reforms are also aimed at quelling some of the roots of China’s growing unrest by giving people a sense of fairness in the justice system, there is a strong economic rationale for the measures.
Writing in the party’s official People’s Daily newspaper last Wednesday, Li Shuguang, a professor at the China University of Political Science and Law, said there could be no economic growth without a sound legal system.
“Protecting intellectual property and contracts are the preconditions for economic development and growth,” Li wrote, adding that the current system was “not working properly” as it gave the government too much scope to abuse its power.
“For healthy future economic growth, the rule of law will play an even more important role in China’s market economy.”
When drawing up contracts, many foreign companies seek to include clauses to enable arbitration in places such as Hong Kong in the event of a dispute.
At the party’s last plenum in November, President Xi Jinping announced ambitious economic reforms that signaled a shift in China’s economy from infrastructure- and export-fueled growth towards a slower, more balanced and sustained expansion.
The government has since carried out a handful of economic reforms, although some critics argue that implementation has not been fast enough.
“They have recognized that without improved rule of law, economic reforms they want to deliver will not succeed,” said a Beijing-based European envoy.
James Zimmerman, managing partner of the Beijing office of law firm Sheppard Mullin and a former chairman of the American Chamber of Commerce China, said removing the influence of the party on court cases was vital.
“We are already seeing a vast improvement in the quality of the written opinions and decisions. But they need the political monkey off their back in order to do their jobs professionally, independently and with transparency,” he said.
“Can we anticipate real change? Probably not. I say this because the party is unlikely to let go of the courts and lawyers. The messages are conflicting as to how far they will go with reform.”
The president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, Joerg Wuttke, added it was vital that companies could challenge the rulings of regulators in court.
None of the recent barrage of anti-trust cases against foreign companies operating in China are known to have been challenged in local courts.
Separately, the government has begun trial programs in a few parts of the country, including the business capital Shanghai, to simplify court bureaucracy, and more details about how this could work nationally should come after the plenum.
The new programs allow judges to make judgments without getting approval from the court’s chief justice, who may not have had anything to do with the case.
Courts will also be funded by the province or even the central government rather than from local-level budgets as part of the trial.
“When the courts’ coin bags are held by the local governments, their independence will be affected, as they are prone to the lobbying of local officials,” Tang Xiaotian, deputy head of the Shanghai Law Society, told the official Xinhua news agency in July.
Additional reporting by Benjamin Kang Lim, Michael Martina, Matthew Miller and Beijing newsroom; Editing by Dean Yates