STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - Swedish fashion company Hennes & Mauritz is focusing on its ethical profile to drive long-term sales growth as shoppers become more interested in how clothes are produced as well as their environmental impact, its new sustainability chief said.
The fashion industry has come under increasing pressure to cut water use and pesticides in cotton farming, reduce pollution from textile factories and improve factory conditions, particularly after the collapse of the Rana Plaza complex in Bangladesh two years ago.
Opinion is split on whether companies are doing enough. While worker rights group Clean Clothes Campaign has accused H&M of using the sustainability issue as a marketing ploy, Corporate Knights magazine declared it to be among the world’s most sustainable companies.
Anna Gedda, H&M’s head of sustainability, is determined the latter view will prevail. Gedda, who reports directly to Chief Executive Karl-Johan Persson, said that H&M customers are demanding more transparency about the origin of the clothes they buy.
“We see it in the amount of queries we get by mail, in stores and in customer surveys. People are aware and want more information on social as well as environmental issues,” she told Reuters.
Several fashion groups, including H&M’s biggest rival Inditex, have ramped up their efforts on environmental and social issues in recent years. H&M, which was relatively quick to recognize the importance of ethical issues to consumers, has been among the more vocal.
H&M, which reports its second-quarter results on Thursday, has pledged that workers at suppliers making about 60 percent of its garments should be paid a “fair living wage” by 2018. It has also said that all its cotton will be sourced sustainably — grown or recycled — by 2020, up from the current 20 percent.
“This is by and large a condition for future growth. What we invest now, we’ll get back later, in that we grow because we will stay relevant,” Gedda said, adding that the costs of improving standards will not be passed on to customers.
Clean Clothes Campaign’s Carin Leffler, however, called on H&M to quantify what it considers to be a “fair living wages” and voiced doubt over its ability to achieve the 2018 target.
“They lack credibility when they don’t back up words with action,” Leffler said.
Others are less skeptical. Corporate Knights magazine’s ranking of the world’s 100 most sustainable companies put H&M 75th. The only other fashion companies to make the grade were Britain’s Marks & Spencer at No.16 and Germany’s Adidas at No.3.
Sustainability is increasingly in focus for investors, too; not only as a sales driver, but also as a risk factor, given the potential for output disruptions and water shortages.
Gedda said H&M hopes that improved wages and conditions at suppliers will translate into more stable production.
Output in Bangladesh and Cambodia, big sourcing markets for H&M, has been hit by protests by textile workers calling for better wages and conditions.
H&M has also faced criticism for not knowing the origin of most of the cotton it uses.
In 2013 it became one of the first big apparel retailers to publish its supplier list, but it still has a long way to go to gain control over the entire production chain. The next step, announced in March, is a plan to map and audit its second-tier suppliers, the fabric factories.
Full transparency is the vision, Gedda said, suggesting the possibility in future to trace every garment’s full history via its tag. A global survey by research firm Nielsen in 2014 indicated that 52 percent of consumers check products’ labels for information on their social or environmental impact.
However, much will rely on improved recycling techniques as H&M, which increased sales by 18 percent in 2014 and runs more than 3,600 stores, seeks to reduce dependence on natural resources.
“The great challenge here is how to increase the share of recycled fibers without it affecting quality,” she said.
Additional reporting by Emma Thomasson; Editing by David Goodman