CAPE TOWN (Reuters) - South Africa’s economy is on the path to recovery but the government will maintain measures to boost jobs and growth, President Jacob Zuma said on Thursday.
Zuma, speaking on the 20th anniversary of the release from prison of Nelson Mandela, said South Africa has changed fundamentally in the past two decades and work should now be done to ensure stronger growth in the future.
ZWELINZIMA VAVI, SECRETARY-GENERAL, Labor FEDERATION COSATU
“Overall (on) the issue of jobs, poverty and inequalities, I’m quite disappointed. I would have thought that the president would acknowledge that South Africa was in a crisis, even before the recession.
“I’m more disappointed that he didn’t speak about the labor brokering in the country, that he didn’t say specifically that the ANC has made a commitment to prohibit all the extremely exploitative measures associated with the labor brokering industry.
“He didn’t engage with the issue of the macroeconomic strategy.
“I like the de-emphasizing of the macroeconomic strategy because I think that over the past 15 years South Africa overly emphasized and focused on the macroeconomic policies to the exclusion of a growth path and industrial strategy.”
“Overall, I think the speech was pretty unsurprising and there was little new policy on the economic front with still no real consensus about the need for fundamental economic change in the country and upside risks to budget.
“We must await the new industrial policy to see what that can deliver.”
“Some excellent stuff about accountability of government, concrete stuff about independent power producers and first-time youth workers ... increased policing (so) all of that is good.
“A lot more in this state of the nation than one has come to expect from such addresses.
“I was quite surprised with the claim of job creation ... it just doesn’t work with me. It sounds like a massaging of figures.”
“It was not inspiring. It was more of a regurgitation of policies, rather than really dealing with what has happened in one year since the last state of the nation, and to that extent it was disappointing.
“He really tried to avoid areas which are controversial because of his ongoing personal life controversies, like HIV/AIDS, government policy and what the message is.
“And I think that is to be expected of course because he is a human being but he grossly tried to downplay that which was one of the defining differences between his administration and that of the former administration. But because of his personal conduct and behavior, he couldn’t mention it robustly. So I think he has done a lot of damage to that in practice.”