WASHINGTON/ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - Pakistan and the United States reached a deal on Tuesday to reopen land routes that NATO uses to supply troops in Afghanistan, ending a seven-month crisis that damaged ties between the two countries and complicated the U.S.-led Afghan war effort.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, in a telephone call with Pakistani Foreign Minister Hina Rabbani Khar, apologized for a November NATO air strike that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers last November and prompted an infuriated Islamabad to slam the supply routes closed.
“We are sorry for the losses suffered by the Pakistani military. We are committed to working closely with Pakistan and Afghanistan to prevent this from ever happening again,” Clinton said in a statement following the conversation.
Khar, in turn, informed Clinton that Pakistan would reopen the supply routes and, in a major concession to the United States, would not follow through on threats to dramatically hike the transit fees.
The deal, which came after several previous attempts at negotiation had failed amid a dispute over a U.S. apology, opened the prospect of broader improvement in U.S.-Pakistan ties.
But even with this hurdle down, others remain. They include Pakistan’s opposition to U.S. drone strikes on its territory, and Washington’s allegations that Islamabad condones, or even assists, anti-American militants.
In her statement, Clinton said the supply lines agreement “is a tangible demonstration of Pakistan’s support for a secure, peaceful, and prosperous Afghanistan and our shared objectives in the region.” She added that the deal would allow the United States and its NATO partners to conduct their planned military drawdown from Afghanistan at a much lower cost.
U.S. officials said the United States was spending $100 million more a month to send supplies across a long alternate route overland across Central Asia and into Afghanistan.
The Pakistani Taliban militant group immediately threatened to attack trucks that resume carrying supplies into Afghanistan, where most of the 128,000 NATO soldiers are due to withdraw by the end of 2014.
“We will attack NATO supplies all over Pakistan. We will not allow anyone to use Pakistani soil to transport supplies that will be used against the Afghan people,” the group’s spokesman told Reuters by telephone from an undisclosed location.
U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who said last month that Washington was losing patience with Pakistan because of the safe havens it offers to insurgents in neighboring Afghanistan, welcomed the news that the supply routes would reopen.
In an interview with Reuters, Panetta all but ruled out an apology to Pakistan over the NATO air strike.
Pakistan’s Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf told senior government leaders on Tuesday that continued closure of the routes was harming Islamabad’s relationship with Washington. Pakistan’s Ambassador to the United States Sherry Rehman said the supply route deal could help to spur more cooperation between the two uneasy partners.
NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen welcomed the announcement, saying it highlighted the important role Pakistan has in supporting a stable future for Afghanistan.
U.S.-Pakistan ties turned markedly worse after the U.S. raid that killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden on Pakistani territory last year. Relations have been further poisoned by the U.S. drone strikes to target suspected militants and Washington’s charge that Islamabad turns a blind eye to Haqqani network militants operating from within its borders.
Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who is among a growing number of U.S. lawmakers who have voiced doubts about the Pakistan alliance, welcomed Tuesday’s announcement, but said more needed to be done to put the relationship on the right footing.
“If the Pakistani military intelligence services would engage in aggressive efforts to combat terrorism in coordination with coalition forces, it would tremendously enhance our successes in Afghanistan,” he said in a statement.
“THREE LITTLE WORDS”
Clinton’s careful statement was not the full-throated apology that Pakistan demanded for the deadly November attack, but went further than Washington had before in expressing regret for an incident that NATO described as an unfortunate accident.
“Foreign Minister Khar and I acknowledged the mistakes that resulted in the loss of Pakistani military lives,” Clinton said, adding that she had reiterated U.S. regrets for the deaths of the soldiers and offered condolences to their families.
The U.S. administration, seeking to shield President Barack Obama from Republican criticism months before November’s presidential election, had resisted an outright apology and political analysts said the moderate expression of regret came following an expensive delay.
“Three little words - ‘We are sorry.’ If they’d been delivered seven months ago, they might have saved hundreds of millions of dollars,” said Jonah Blank, a former aide to Senator John Kerry, who is now at the Rand Corporation.
With a deal reached, both sides were set to benefit.
The agreement appeared to include a commitment by the United States to initially pay Pakistan $1.8 billion in military aid arrears.
But Washington would only have to provide $250 in handling fees for each shipment of NATO supplies going into Afghanistan, the same amount paid on those shipments before November. In recent months, Pakistani officials had demanded fee hikes that some suggested could have amounted to a twenty-fold increase, at about $5,000 per shipment.
Payment of aid arrears could be a windfall for Pakistan’s unpopular government, which is under pressure to deal with a struggling economy, chronic power cuts and inflation in the lead-up to parliamentary elections expected early next year.
Additional reporting by Missy Ryan and Michael Georgy in Islamabad and David Alexander in Washington.; Editing by Warren Strobel and Christopher Wilson