PARIS (Reuters) - Former President Nicolas Sarkozy said on Wednesday France’s justice system was being used for political ends, after he was put under investigation on suspicion of using his influence to gain details of a probe into his 2007 election campaign.
The judicial step, which often but not always leads to trial, is a major setback to Sarkozy’s hopes of a political comeback after his 2012 defeat by Socialist Francois Hollande.
The conservative politician denies wrongdoing in a string of investigations where his direct or indirect implication has cast doubt on his viability as a candidate in the 2017 elections.
“I say to all those who are listening or watching that I have never betrayed them and have never committed an act against the Republic’s principles and the rule of law,” Sarkozy said in his first interview since losing the 2012 election.
“The situation is sufficiently serious to tell the French people where we stand on the political exploitation of part of the legal system today.”
In the 17-minute interview on broadcaster TF1’s national evening news, a determined and angry Sarkozy launched an attack on the magistrates who had placed him under investigation, saying they had wanted to “humiliate” him.
Describing the accusations against him as “grotesque”, heaccused Justice Minister Christiane Taubira and Prime Minister Manuel Valls of manipulating the process and being aware of details of the probe they should not have known.
“I passionately love my country and I am not a man who gets discouraged in the face of dirty tricks and political manipulations,” Sarkozy said.
Magistrates are looking at whether Sarkozy used his influence to secure leaked details of an inquiry into alleged irregularities in his victorious 2007 campaign. He is suspected of influence-peddling, corrupting officials, and benefiting from breach of professional secrets, the prosecutor’s office said.
The first former president to spend time in police custody, Sarkozy, 59, was detained for 15 hours on Tuesday before appearing before investigating magistrates who will run the inquiry. He was then released without bail.
Sarkozy “has gone through other ordeals of this nature, he has always known how to fight”, said Paul-Albert Iweins, the attorney for Sarkozy’s own attorney, Thierry Herzog, who is also being investigated for influence-peddling along with a judge involved in the affair.
Iweins said the inquiry was weak as it relied on legally questionable phone taps of conversations between Sarkozy and Herzog as well as between Herzog and the president of the French Bar.
Sarkozy’s allies cast doubt over the impartiality of one of the investigating magistrates, with Christian Estrosi, the mayor of Nice, telling France Info state radio that Hollande’s government had whipped up “an atmosphere of hate”.
Valls dismissed suggestions of a plot.
Investigating magistrates have a unique and powerful role under French law, both gathering evidence and determining whether it is solid enough for a trial. After the inquiry, the magistrate can drop the case for lack of evidence or “charge” the accused, sending the case to trial.
Influence-peddling can be punished by up to five years in prison and corrupting officials can trigger a sentence of up to 10 years.
It was the second time the ex-president, who lost immunity from legal prosecution a month after he left office in June 2012, had been placed under such a judicial probe. The first was in 2013 but magistrates later dropped the case against him.
Six legal cases, including this one, hang over the ex-president’s head, a shadow that many in his fractured UMP party believe compromises his ability to lead a comeback in 2017.
“This legal saga is disastrous,” wrote Le Monde daily in a front-page editorial. “Each of these episodes ... demonstrate that for its actors and the leading one in particular, the end justifies all the means.”
When asked whether he would throw his hat into the ring for the opposition UMP party’s leadership later this year, Sarkozy said he did not give up in the face of adversity and would make a decision after the summer.
“The question of whether I give up or not is irrelevant ... because one has a duty and not rights towards their country. I am concerned by the situation in France, the state of France and I know of the worries of the French and their suffering.
“I will have to decide, after a period of reflection, at the end of August (or) start of September, on what I should do.”In the current affair, Sarkozy is accused of using his influence to get information on a troublesome legal inquiry into funding irregularities in his victorious 2007 election campaign.
Specifically, magistrates are looking to see whether Sarkozy tried to get a judge promoted to the bench in Monaco in exchange for information on that campaign funding inquiry, in which he was accused of exploiting the mental frailty of France’s richest woman, L’Oreal heiress Liliane Bettencourt, for campaign funds.
Those accusations against Sarkozy were dismissed in October.
But as investigators last year used phone-taps to examine separate allegations that late Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi funded the same campaign, they began to suspect that Sarkozy had kept tabs on the Bettencourt case, before he was dropped from it, through a network of informants.
Those suspicions prompted police to launch an inquiry in February, which led to Wednesday’s events. Under French law, a suspect is not formally charged with a crime unless he is sent to trial.
Writing by Alexandria Sage and John Irish; Editing by Mark John, Anna Willard and Andrew Roche